tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839412.post2991414138758436176..comments2024-03-19T07:48:54.021-06:00Comments on Gus Van Horn: Confusion in a Burrito ShellGus Van Hornhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05126749051688217781noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839412.post-24015120105017956182014-05-28T14:42:56.500-06:002014-05-28T14:42:56.500-06:00Steve,
Thanks for the correction and the addition...Steve,<br /><br />Thanks for the correction and the additional information regarding Chipotle, a restaurant I was taken to once, during a job interview over a decade ago. I would agree that the outfit is nutty on such a basis, and would regard it as an example of a company supporting a cause ultimately detrimental to capitalism and itself.<br /><br />GusGus Van Hornhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05126749051688217781noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8839412.post-67579004048430659882014-05-28T08:47:49.390-06:002014-05-28T08:47:49.390-06:00I agree with this post, especially the point about...I agree with this post, especially the point about property rights and about the confusion about the issue detailed in the article. I have just a couple additional observations.<br /><br />'I'll pass over the question of whether individuals should have a legal right to possess weapons whose sole purpose is military use.'<br /><br />1. I don’t think these were military weapons. The article says ‘military-style’ which suggests they were probably semi-automatic rifles made to look like military weapons. (automatic weapons are illegal in all fifty states as far as I know)<br />2. Chipotle: Isn’t that the nutcase company that only serves organic food (whatever that means) and produces videos saying that industrial agriculture is evil? So GMOs and insect pesticides are more deadly than guns. Go figure? Maybe we should start feeding our grain to the terrorists. <br />Steve Dnoreply@blogger.com