What Motivates Them
Thursday, May 09, 2019
Maybe it will get vetoed for not including a subsidy for unversal juggling training... (Image by Juan Pablo Rodriguez, via Unsplash, license.) |
The Reason piece over-generously grants that Bob Smith (D-Middlesex) is sincerely "concerned with the aesthetic appeal of [his] state," but it does contain a passage that I think better illustrates why someone would use such a flimsy excuse to violate the rights of his constituents so flagrantly:
The idea, Smith says, came to him while on vacation in Aruba, where a similar bag ban is in effect.Let that last sentence sink in for a moment, because this is the "practical result" Smith is really after: Everyone in line, meekly following orders no matter how intrusive or ridiculous -- in a nation founded in part because its original inhabitants found stamps to be a tyrannical abuse of government power.
"Nobody's grumbling," the senator told NJ.com, saying that the Arubans have really taken to bringing their own reusable bags to the store. "Everybody in the line, they all do it." [link in original]
Up to a point -- and only because Americans have been acclimated for decades to look to the government first to solve problems -- one can take a policy proposal to come from a place of genuine concern for our welfare. But this proposal -- which unsurprisingly includes a ban on plastic straws -- is far, far across that line.
The people of the state of New Jersey should be viscerally angry about this whole idea. I certainly am.
-- CAV
2 comments:
In the area of unintended consequences, I wonder if there is a link between plastic shopping bag bans and increases in urban areas contaminated with homeless feces. Tim Pool was recently trying to understand why places like LA and SF were having this problem but other Democrat controlled cities were not; my hypothesis was that the homeless in those cities no longer had readily available plastic bags to poop in.
That sounds quite plausible to me.
Post a Comment